Opened 15 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
#43 closed enhancement (wontfix)
add support for LSB chroot
Reported by: | Bryan Gartner | Owned by: | Bruno Cornec |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | trivial | Milestone: | |
Component: | pb | Version: | 0.9.6 |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
Can you add support for the LSB chroot sample implementations for VEs. Or provide documentation on how one achieves adding support for a new distro-version-arch?
Change History (7)
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
Owner: | set to |
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:2 by , 15 years ago
Milestone: | 0.9.7 → 0.9.8 |
---|
comment:3 by , 14 years ago
comment:4 by , 14 years ago
Milestone: | 0.9.9 → 0.9.10 |
---|
The problem I'm meeting with a LSB chroot, is that the chroot provided by LF are incomplete and do not allow to build inside them. So we would need to add software in them in order to make them usable to build (It's independant of pb itself).
I need to launch a discussion on the relevant mailing list for that.
comment:5 by , 14 years ago
Milestone: | 0.9.10 → 0.9.11 |
---|
Some progress have been made (sort of) with discussions on the LSB ML. However, there is still no such thing as an LSB chroot. Also see LSB
comment:6 by , 13 years ago
Milestone: | 0.9.11 |
---|---|
Type: | defect → enhancement |
comment:7 by , 5 years ago
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
If someone wants to contribute, fine, but I won't have time to work on this.
If you can add the required modificatoins to /etc/pb/pb.conf as of rev [898], then I'll be happy to integrate those. I think that wit hthis new mecanism, LSB suppotr should be easy. I'll try to look at it later as time permits, but if you want to try and rport, I'll be happy to help.